Category Archives: Pet Food Aflatoxin

Research-Raw meat-based diet for pets: a neglected source of human exposure to Salmonella and pathogenic Escherichia coli clones carrying mcr, Portugal, September 2019 to January 2020

Eurosurveillance

The pet industry has evolved in recent decades due to increasing pet populations, stronger human–pet bonds and demand for high-quality pet food products [1,2]. Processed pet food manufactured with various processing methods (e.g. grinding, cooking, extrusion and dehydration) has traditionally been considered microbiological safe and nutritionally suitable for feeding pets [1,3]. However, since some pet owners consider unprocessed food healthier, raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for dogs have gained popularity [1,2,4]. The RMBDs are mainly composed of uncooked or minimally processed meat, bones and organs, with freezing as the primary treatment, and are considered to be more natural than conventional processed pet food [1,5]. Nevertheless, the scientific evidence supporting RMBD benefits is scarce, and many veterinary professional organisations (e.g. the World Small Animal Veterinary Association) and international public health agencies (e.g. the United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)) view them as potential health hazards for both animals and humans [1,5]; awareness of this issue appears less evident in Europe [6]. The safety concerns associated with RMBDs are related to the potential contamination of raw ingredients with zoonotic pathogenic bacteria and parasites [1,3,4]. Such contamination could lead to the spread of these pathogens to both pets and humans cohabitating with pets, through direct contact with the pet or its feed, or indirectly through contact with contaminated household surfaces or hands during feed preparation.

In the European Union (EU), legal requirements for the use of animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption are established, including those to produce processed or raw pet food, helping to ensure microbiological safety [7]. Nevertheless, since 2020, there have been more than 20 notifications or recalls of pet food and RMBD in the EU due to the detection of zoonotic pathogens, particularly  and pathogenic  [8], and also cases of human infections with  and Shiga toxin-producing  (STEC) linked to exposure to RMBDs [911]. Several studies have also established a correlation between the microbiota of pets and their owners, including the presence of antibiotic-resistant strains, with pet food as a potential source [12,13]. However, certain antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes of public health concern, such as the  gene conferring resistance to the last-line antibiotic colistin, have not been extensively studied in pet food and RMBDs [1,1416]. Consequently, these antibiotic-resistant strains and genes have not been recognised as notable food safety issues in the context of the pet food industry [6]. To address this knowledge gap, we aimed to investigate the occurrence of and further characterise  and other  resistant to critical antibiotics, such as colistin, in dog food, including RMBDs, that is available in stores in Portugal to investigate if they represent a possible source of these hazards to public health.

Research – How to deal with feed ingredients prone to Aflatoxin contamination

Pet Food Industry

Find out which animal feed ingredients are more prone to aflatoxin contamination, when the risk of contamination is higher and strategies to mitigate its effects on animals.

Aflatoxins are naturally occurring mycotoxins produced by certain molds, primarily Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. These toxic compounds can contaminate animal feed, posing significant health risks to livestock and poultry. In this article, we will discuss which animal feed ingredients are more prone to aflatoxin contamination, when the risk of contamination is higher and strategies to mitigate its effects on animals.

USA- Purina Bird Luvers Blend Wild Bird Food. A blend of Grains for Birds – Aflatoxin

FDA

Purina Bird Luvers Blend Wild Bird Food. A blend of Grains for Birds. Item # 54KB_0048319. UPC 8 04273-01657 3. Net Wt 40 lb (18.14kg). Manufactured for Purina Animal Nutrition LLC, Arden Hills MN 55126

Lot Code: 23191JSC

872 – 40 lb. bags

Bird feed may contain elevated level of aflatoxin.

Ghana – Over 40% of grains contain unacceptable levels of Aflatoxin contamination

Ghana Web

See  the link above for the full story

Research – Determination of mycotoxins in nuts, cereals, legumes, and coffee beans and effectiveness of a selenium-based decontamination treatment

Wiley Online

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for the rapid quantification of multiple mycotoxins, specifically aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2), ochratoxin A (OTA), deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearalenone (ZEN), in walnuts, pistachios, peanuts, coffee beans, rice, and chickpeas from various countries. Total counts of fungi, Aspergillus flavus, and Aspergillus parasiticus were also assessed, along with the effectiveness of a decontamination treatment with inorganic selenium to reduce mycotoxin levels. Of the 78 samples tested, 69% were contaminated with mycotoxins. ZEN, the predominant mycotoxin contaminant, was detected in all the contaminated samples in concentrations often exceeding the maximum level, followed by AFG1 (28% of the contaminated samples), DON (22%), AFG2 (11%), and AFB1 (5.5%). The occurrence of aflatoxins was associated with high proportions of A. flavus and A. parasiticus. Complete removal of AFB1 from walnuts and DON from roasted coffee beans was achieved by treatment with aqueous selenium, while the levels of ZEN and AFG1 were respectively lowered by 65% to 89% depending on the commodity and by about 56% in roasted coffee beans. While this novel treatment is a promising approach for mycotoxin decontamination, it is not intended to replace safe practices upstream.

Austria – Pets – Fiffy meadow hay 700g – Mold/Mould

AGES

Miscellaneous Recall

AGES informs about a recall of the company SPAR. On April 14th, 2023, the company initiated a recall of the product Fiffy meadow hay 700g:
©AGES
recall reason
Mold
Marketed by
SAVE
Manufacturer
SAVE
Expiry Date
02.2025
Batch number
No. 156 (Best before 11/24) / No. 161 (Best before 02/25)

SPAR continuously controls the products of the SPAR brands to ensure the highest quality – not only for food, but also for items for pets, for example. During a routine quality control, a microbiological deviation (mold formation) was found in the product “Fiffy Wiesenheu 700g” of batches no. 156 (best before 11/24) and no. 161 (best before 02/25). For this reason, SPAR is recalling the product with the above batch numbers. This warning does not imply that the nonconformity was caused by the producer, manufacturer, importer or distributor.

Customers are asked not to use the “Fiffy Wiesenhay 700g” with the batch numbers 156 and 161 for their pets due to a microbiological deviation (mold formation). All other Fiffy products or meadow hay of other brands are not affected by this recall.

All customers who have bought a product with the batch numbers mentioned can of course return it to the nearest SPAR, EUROSPAR or INTERSPAR store or Maximarkt. Customers are reimbursed the purchase price even without a receipt.

Customers who have questions about this are welcome to contact customer service at office@spar.at or call the freephone number 0800 / 22 11 20 .

original recall

Composition-Based Risk Estimation of Mycotoxins in Dry Dog Foods

MDPI

Abstract

The risk of mycotoxins co-occurrence in extrusion-produced dry foods increases due to their composition based on various grains and vegetables. This study aimed to validate a risk estimation for the association between ingredients and the ELISA-detected levels of DON, FUM, ZEA, AFs, T2, and OTA in 34 dry dog food products. The main ingredients were corn, beet, and oil of different origins (of equal frequency, 79.41%), rice (67.6%), and wheat (50%). DON and FUM had the strongest positive correlation (0.635, = 0.001). The presence of corn in the sample composition increased the median DON and ZEA levels, respectively, by 99.45 μg/kg and 65.64 μg/kg, p = 0.011. In addition to DON and ZEA levels, integral corn presence increased the FUM median levels by 886.61 μg/kg, = 0.005. For corn gluten flour-containing samples, DON, FUM, and ZEA median differences still existed, and OTA levels also differed by 1.99 μg/kg, < 0.001. Corn gluten flour presence was strongly associated with DON levels >403.06 μg/kg (OR = 38.4, RR = 9.90, = 0.002), FUM levels >1097.56 μg/kg (OR = 5.56, RR = 1.45, = 0.048), ZEA levels >136.88 μg/kg (OR = 23.00, RR = 3.09, = 0.002), and OTA levels >3.93 μg/kg (OR = 24.00, RR = 3.09, = 0.002). Our results suggest that some ingredients or combinations should be avoided due to their risk of increasing mycotoxin levels.

Research – Alltech: Testing of corn and forage in Europe indicates moderate to high mycotoxin risk for dairy cows.

Feed Navigator

In all regions of Europe, grass and corn silage samples contained levels of mycotoxins that would be deemed higher risk for use in dairy production, finds the Alltech 2022 European Harvest Analysis.

Research – Recent Research on Fusarium Mycotoxins in Maize—A Review

MDPI

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most susceptible crops to pathogenic fungal infections, and in particular to the Fusarium species. Secondary metabolites of Fusarium spp.—mycotoxins are not only phytotoxic, but also harmful to humans and animals. They can cause acute or chronic diseases with various toxic effects. The European Union member states apply standards and legal regulations on the permissible levels of mycotoxins in food and feed. This review summarises the most recent knowledge on the occurrence of toxic secondary metabolites of Fusarium in maize, taking into account modified forms of mycotoxins, the progress in research related to the health effects of consuming food or feed contaminated with mycotoxins, and also the development of biological methods for limiting and/or eliminating the presence of the same in the food chain and in compound feed. View Full-Text

Research – Straw Can Pose Mycotoxin Risk in Dairy Heifer Diets

Dairy Herd

Straw is a common, high-fiber, low-energy ingredient in U.S. dairy heifer rations. While we normally monitor grain quality to watch for harmful mycotoxins, it turns out straw can carry its own mycotoxin risk, according to a recent feed quality evaluation by Alltech, Inc.

Each year, Alltech conducts comprehensive mycotoxin testing programs in the U.S., Canada, and Europe to assess the mycotoxin risk in newly harvested grain crops. For the first time this year, wheat and barley straw were added to the sampling in Europe.

Danish farmers were worried about the damaging effects of wet weather both pre- and post-harvest. Because excessive moisture delayed straw harvest, the crops lay in the field for extended periods, damaging quality and fueling mold contamination.

A total of 70 straw samples from Denmark were evaluated. Deoxynivalenol (DON) was identified in 84% of samples, and emerging mycotoxins were found in 70% of samples. All told, 95% of samples contained some form of mycotoxin, with 50% containing two or more.

According a bulletin on mycotoxins in forage shared by the University of Wisconsin, DON may be a marker for other mycotoxins in contaminated feeds. When young dairy animals consume mycotoxins, they can be at risk for feed refusals, diarrhea, and immunosuppression. Additionally, mycotoxin-induced outcomes may be vague, and include unthriftiness, rough haircoat, poor body condition, and reproductive problems.

Alltech technical advisor and veterinarian, Dr. Radka Boutova, DVM, suggested adding straw to the list of feedstuffs that are screened for mycotoxins if it is a commonly used ingredient in a young stock ration. This is particularly important if the straw crop was stressed and/or delayed in the field due to unfavorable weather conditions, or for any straw that shows visible signs of mold.