Category Archives: Uncategorized

Spain – Spain Listeria monocytogenes Outbreak growing – over 200 ill and 3 dead

Food Poison Journal

According to Google Translate, and therefore the Spanish Health Authorities:

On Friday, August 16, Public Health of the Autonomous Community of Andalusia notified the Center for Coordination of Health Alerts and Emergencies of the Ministry of Health, Consumption and Social Welfare an outbreak of food poisoning by listeriosis in its Autonomous Community associated with the consumption of industrial meatloaf of the La Mechá brand prepared by a company located in the municipality of Seville.

The association between the product involved and the outbreak occurred on August 14 after the positive results for listeria in the analyzes carried out in the Autonomous Community in several processed meat products corresponding to different batches and that had consumed most of the cases identified.

Hong Kong – Not to consume three kinds of brownies imported from Japan with possible presence of mould

CFS

Issue Date 28.8.2019
Source of Information Food Incident Surveillance System
Food Product Three kinds of prepackaged brownies imported from Japan
Product Name and Description (1) Product name: Walnut Brownie

Brand: Muji

Country of origin: Japan

JAN code: 4550002874162

(2) Product name: Earl Grey Brownie

Brand: Muji

Country of origin: Japan

JAN code: 4550002874186

(3) Product name: Caramel Brownie

Brand: Muji

Country of origin: Japan

JAN code: 4550002874179

Reason For Issuing Alert
  • The Centre for Food Safety (CFS), through its routine Food Incident Surveillance System, noted that Muji (Japan) is recalling the abovementioned products due to the possible presence of mould in the products.
Action Taken by the Centre for Food Safety
  • Upon learning of the incident, the CFS immediately followed up with Muji (Hong Kong) Company Limited. According to information provided by the company, it had imported the affected products which were put on sale at its outlets. The company had already removed from shelves and stopped sale of the affected products, and initiated a recall.
  • The CFS will continue to follow up on the incident and take appropriate action. An investigation is ongoing.
Advice to the Trade
  • Stop using or selling the affected products immediately if they possess it.
Advice to Consumers
  • Not to consume the affected products if they have bought it.
Further Information
  • The CFS press release
  • Members of the public may call Muji (Hong Kong) Company Limited’s hotline at 2694 9309 during office hours for enquiries about the recall.

USA – Brutus & Barnaby LLC recalls all size bags of “Pig Ears Natural Treats for Dogs” because of a possible Salmonella health risk

FDA

Company Announcement

Brutus & Barnaby of Clearwater, Florida is recalling all size variations of our Pig Ears for Dogs because it has the potential to be contaminated with SalmonellaSalmonella can affect animals eating the products and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the products or any surfaces exposed to these products.

Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

Bags of our Pig Ears were distributed throughout all states via Amazon.com, Chewy.com, Brutusandbarnaby.com and the brick and mortar Natures Food Patch in Clearwater, Florida.

The product is identified by our trademarked logo  and says “Pig Ears 100% Natural Treats for Dogs”.  These were available in 4 different sizes:

  • 8 Count
  • 12 Count
  • 25 Count
  • 100 Count

Brutus & Barnaby has ceased the production and distribution of the product as FDA and the company continue their investigation as to what caused the problem.

Consumers who have purchased Brutus & Barnaby pig ears are urged to destroy any remaining product not yet consumed and to contact the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-800-489-0970   Monday-Friday 9am-5 PM EST.

Research – Foodborne pathogen sheltered by harmless bacteria that support biofilm formation

Science Daily

Pathogenic bacteria that stubbornly lurk in some apple-packing facilities may be sheltered and protected by harmless bacteria that are known for their ability to form biofilms, according to Penn State researchers, who suggest the discovery could lead to development of alternative foodborne-pathogen-control strategies.

That was the key finding that emerged from a study of three tree-fruit-packing facilities in the Northeast where contamination with Listeria monocytogenes was a concern. The research, done in collaboration with the apple industry, was an effort to better understand the microbial ecology of food-processing facilities. The ultimate goal is to identify ways to improve pathogen control in the apple supply chain to avoid foodborne disease outbreaks and recalls of apples and apple products.

“This work is part of Penn State’s efforts to help producers comply with standards set forth in the federal Food Safety Modernization Act, often referred to as FSMA,” said researcher Jasna Kovac, assistant professor of food science, College of Agricultural Sciences. “The Department of Food Science at Penn State, through research and extension activities, has an ongoing collaboration with the apple industry, led by Luke LaBorde, professor of food science.”

In the study, researchers sought to understand the composition of microbiota in apple-packing environments and its association with the occurrence of the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Their testing revealed that a packing plant with a significantly higher Listeria monocytogenes occurrence was uniquely dominated by the bacterial family Pseudomonadaceae and the fungal family Dipodascaceae.

“As we investigated the properties of these microorganisms, we learned that they are known to be very good biofilm formers,” said lead researcher Xiaoqing Tan, a recently graduated master’s degree student in food science and a member of the Penn State Microbiome Center, housed in the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences. “Based on our findings, we hypothesize that these harmless microorganisms are supporting the persistence of Listeria monocytogenes because they protect the harmful bacteria by enclosing them in biofilms. We are testing this hypothesis in a follow-up study.”

Biofilms are a collection of microorganisms that attach to a surface and then secrete a slimy material that slows down the penetration of cleaners and sanitizers, Kovac explained. “If a pathogenic bacterium is enclosed in a biofilm formed by microbiota, it is more likely that cleaning and sanitizing procedures will be less effective,” she said. “This is a novel perspective, and it may well explain how Listeria monocytogenes has persisted in food-processing plants despite repeated efforts to kill and remove it.”

The findings of the research, published today (Aug. 21) in Microbiome, provide insight into the Listeria contamination problem and may lead to researchers and the apple industry getting closer to solving it, Kovac believes. Equipment in fruit-processing plants — such as brush conveyors — have a poor sanitary design that makes them difficult to clean and sanitize, she pointed out. She and LaBorde plan to work with the apple industry to devise more effective cleaning and sanitizing strategies.

“Following up on these findings, we are experimenting with some of the nonpathogenic strains of bacteria that are not harmful to humans to see whether they can be used as biocontrols,” she said. “Once applied on the surfaces of the equipment in these environments, they may be able to outcompete and suppress Listeria, thus reducing food-safety risks and potential regulatory action. We are still exploring that approach in a controlled laboratory environment. If it proves to be feasible, we would like to test it in apple-packing and processing facilities.”

The challenge presented by microbiota possibly sheltering Listeria monocytogenes is not limited to fruit-processing facilities or produce, Penn State researchers suspect. They will soon begin analyzing microbial communities in dairy-processing facilities to determine the microbial composition and ecology of these environments.

Also involved in the research at Penn State were Taejung Chung, a doctoral degree student in food science, affiliated with the Microbiome Center, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences; and Yi Chen and Dumitru Macarisin, researchers at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, supported this research.

Research – Distribution and Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in a Heavily Contaminated Poultry Processing Facility

Journal of Food Protection

ABSTRACT

We studied the colonization and distribution of Listeria monocytogenes in a heavily contaminated poultry processing plant over a 1-year period. A total of 180 nonfood contact surfaces, 70 food contact surfaces, 29 personnel, and 40 food samples were analyzed. L. monocytogenes isolates were subtyped by PCR serotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus sequence typing. L. monocytogenes was detected in samples collected at every visit to the plant, and 43.8% (visit 4) to 65.6% (visit 7) of samples were positive, for an overall prevalence of 55.2%. The deboning area had the highest prevalence of positive samples (83.3%), and the processing area had the highest diversity of PFGE types. Ninety percent of the final products were positive for L. monocytogenes. Most of the isolates belonged to well-known persistent L. monocytogenes sequence types (ST9 and ST121). This study illustrates a well-established L. monocytogenes contamination problem in a poultry processing plant associated with a generalized failure of the food safety system as a whole. These findings reflect the potential for L. monocytogenes contamination when the food safety and quality management system is unsatisfactory, as described in the present study. It is essential to revise food safety and quality management systems to eliminate L. monocytogenes from food processing facilities, to control the entrance of sporadic sequence types, and to prevent L. monocytogenes spread within such facilities, especially in those premises with higher L. monocytogenes prevalence in the environment and final food products.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Deboning and processing areas had the highest L. monocytogenes contamination.

  • PFGE3/ST9 and PFGE7/ST121 were the most prevalent and persistent strains.

  • Improving hygiene measures is essential for reducing the 100% prevalence in the final product.

Research – How E. coli knows how to cause the worst possible infection

Science Daily

Ecoli Istock

Image CDC

A pair of University of Virginia School of Medicine scientists have revealed how E. coli seeks out the most oxygen-free crevices of your colon to cause the worst infection possible. The discovery could one day let doctors prevent the infection by allowing E. coli to pass harmlessly through the body.

The new discovery shows just how the foodborne pathogen knows where and when to begin colonizing the colon on its way to making you sick. By recognizing the low-oxygen environment of the large intestine, the dangerous bacterium gives itself the best odds of establishing a robust infection — one that is punishing for the host.

“Bacterial pathogens typically colonize a specific tissue in the host. Therefore, as part of their infection strategies, bacterial pathogens precisely time deployment of proteins and toxins to these specific colonization niches in the human host. This allows the pathogens to save energy and avoid detection by our immune systems and ultimately cause disease,” said researcher Melissa Kendall, PhD, of UVA’s Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology. “By knowing how bacterial pathogens sense where they are in the body, we may one day be able to prevent E. coli, as well as other pathogens, from knowing where it is inside a human host and allow it to pass through the body without causing an infection.”

A Bacterial Goldilocks

E. coli naturally lives in our colons, and most strains do us no harm. But there are several strains that can cause cramps, diarrhea, vomiting, even kidney failure and death. Children are at particular risk. As such, E. coli outbreaks appear periodically in the news. In July, for example, people in several states were sickened by E. coli linked to ground bison meat.

Kendall and graduate student Elizabeth M. Melson have shed important light on how harmful E. coli infections establish themselves in the body. The researchers outlined a process the bacteria use to detect low oxygen levels in the large intestine and then produce proteins that allow E. coli to attach to host cells and establish infection.

Oxygen actually diffuses from the intestinal tissue into the gut, and there are comparably higher levels in the small intestine than the large. E. coli specifically waits until it has reached the-low oxygen large intestine before striking.

E. coli‘s vital asset is a small form of RNA that activates particular genes when oxygen levels are low enough, the researchers reveal. It’s at this point that the infection really gets established. Thanks to this natural sensing process, the bacteria are able to establish infection and begin to manufacture harmful Shiga toxins.

The researchers believe that other bacterial pathogens, such as Shigella and Salmonella, likely employ a similar control mechanism, though more work needs to be done to establish that.

“If scientists can figure how to block oxygen sensing, we may be able to prevent E. coli from making proteins that allow it to stick to our guts,” Kendall said. “This may be an effective strategy to limit infection, and because we are not targeting growth or survival, E. coli may not develop drug resistance — it just doesn’t know where it is.”

Research – Ozone-based treatments for inactivation of Salmonella enterica in tree nuts: Inoculation protocol and surrogate suitability considerations

Science Direct

Abstract

The feasibility of using gaseous ozone, alone or in combination with other treatments, to decontaminate in-shell almonds and pistachios, prepared under different pathogen-inoculation conditions, was explored. Nuts were inoculated with either Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis or a potential Salmonella surrogate, Enterococcus faecium OSY 31284. The effect of inoculation method (with or without vacuum application), and of drying inoculated nuts (up to three days) on treatment efficacy was investigated. Inoculated nuts were subjected to gaseous ozone alone (almonds, pistachios) or ozone in combination with heating in brine solution (pistachios). Ozone treatment included application of vacuum (10 in Hg), followed by vessel pressurization to 12.5 psig with ozone‑oxygen mixture (160 g ozone/m3 gas mixture) and holding for 30 min. Heating was conducted in a brine solution (5% NaCl) at 70 °C, for 10 min. Ozone-based treatments were significantly more effective (P < 0.05) on almonds than pistachios, with maximum S. Enteritidis reduction of 2.9 vs. 0.8 log CFU/g, regardless of inoculation method or the drying time. Treatment of inoculated pistachios with heated brine and gaseous ozone reduced S. Enteritidis population by 5.0 to 7.0 log CFU/g and was not significantly more effective than treatment with heated brine alone (reduction of 4.8 to 7.1 log CFU/g). Application of vacuum during inoculation increased bacterial population on nut kernels by approximately 1.2 log CFU/g, but the increase in inoculum population had no effect on inactivation of either species of inoculated bacteria. Decontamination treatments were less effective against both bacteria by up to 2 log CFU/g when drying time of inoculated nuts increased. Efaecium was significantly more resistant to heat and ozone treatment (P < 0.05) than was S. Enteritidis on pistachios, but not on almonds. Results of this study show that laboratory methodology affects observed treatment effectiveness. Considering its high resistance to the heat-ozone combination, Efaecium may not be a suitable surrogate for S. Enteritidis during processing of pistachios by this treatment. Efficacy of ozone gas to decontaminate S. Enteritidisinoculated nuts depends heavily on the type of nut. Although reductions of S. Enteritidis populations on in-shell pistachios are low, treatment of in-shell almonds resulted in greater reductions, indicating the promise of this technology to enhance the safety of specific nut products.

Contagion Live – Outbreak Monitor – Listeria monocytogenes

Contagion Live111111

 

Canada – Food Worker with Hepatitis A

So not just in the USA, Canada as well. Is it time for all food workers to be immunised?

Food Poison Journal

Southwestern Public Health advises any patrons who ate at TA Travel Centre’s restaurant at 535 Mill Street (401 exit 230) in Woodstock, ON, between August 6, 2019 and August 22, 2019 that they may have been exposed to the hepatitis A virus.

“Unfortunately, an individual may have hepatitis A and not know it. That is what occurred in this situation. The food service worker handled food in the restaurant, so this communication is relevant to anyone who ordered off the menu in the restaurant or ordered take out.

USA – Papaya importer fires back at FDA; says it isn’t linked to outbreaks – FDA Statement Letter

Food Safety News kswfoodworld

A firm that the government says has been importing contaminated papayas since at least 2011 is vehemently denying statements made in an FDA warning, despite evidence that Cavi brand papayas have been linked to several Salmonella outbreaks, including a current one.

The warning letter, sent yesterday by the Food and Drug Administration and posted for the public today, cites numerous times from 2011 through this year when papayas imported by Agroson’s LLC in the Bronx, NY, were linked to outbreaks that sickened hundreds of people.

FDA

Statement calling on all sectors of the papaya industry to improve practices to better protect consumers.

Every day Americans enjoy an abundant food supply that is among the safest in the world. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration works tirelessly to ensure that foods available to consumers, whether they are produced domestically or abroad, meet the FDA’s food safety requirements and that we are using all available tools to ensure compliance.

As demand and tastes continue to drive change in the market, consumers’ desire for a variety of products available year-round have increased the number of imported foods offered for sale in the U.S. To keep up with this trend, we have doubled down on our efforts to ensure the safety of imported food. This includes issuing a new Strategy for the Safety of Imported Food and requesting new funding from Congress to support our efforts.

While we continue to focus on shifting our work upholding food safety from response to prevention, we know that there are times where we will still need to respond to problems when they arise, including outbreaks of foodborne illness. This is especially important when we see recurrent patterns of illness associated with particular commodities. For example, fresh papayas. This commodity is most often eaten raw, without cooking or processing to eliminate microbial hazards; and therefore, the way they are grown, harvested, packed, held, processed and distributed is crucial to minimizing the risk of contamination with human pathogens.

Unfortunately, since 2011, American consumers have been exposed to eight outbreaks caused by Salmonella serotypes linked to imported, fresh papaya. And, just this June we started an investigation into an outbreak of Salmonella Uganda illnesses tied to the consumption of whole, fresh papaya imported from Mexico. While the 2019 outbreak is ongoing, the first seven outbreaks accounted for almost 500 reported cases of illness, more than 100 hospitalizations, and two deaths.

This trend has to stop. The pattern of recurrent outbreaks we have observed since 2011, including the 2019 illnesses, have involved Salmonella infections traced back to, or are suspected of being associated with, papaya grown in Mexico. The recurring nature of these outbreaks is a clear indication that more must be done within all sectors of the papaya industry to protect its customers and to meet its legal obligations. This includes growers, importers and even retailers that can and must do more.

This is why today we have issued a letter calling on all sectors of the papaya industry to take actions to prevent these outbreaks in the future. We are urging growers, packers, shippers and retailers in the papaya industry to review their operations and make all necessary changes to strengthen public health safeguards.

Our letter calls on the papaya industry to assess the factors that make their crops vulnerable to contamination. If a foodborne pathogen is identified in the crop or growing environment, a root cause analysis should be performed to determine the likely source of contamination. Procedures and practices that minimize that contamination must be implemented.

We are strongly encouraging the papaya industry to examine the use and monitoring of water used to grow, spray (pesticides, fungicides), move, rinse or wax crops to identify and minimize risks from potential hazards. All sectors of the industry should adopt tools and practices needed to enhance traceability since papayas are a perishable commodity, to more rapidly facilitate the tracking of involved product to expedite its removal from commerce, prevent additional consumer exposures, and properly focus any recall actions.

And finally, they should fund and actively engage in food safety research to identify the potential sources and routes of contamination by microbial pathogens and develop data-driven and risk-based preventive controls.

In response to this most recent Salmonella Uganda outbreak, the FDA deployed an inspection team to the packing house and farm that was linked to the contaminated papayas via traceback and epidemiological evidence. The findings of those visits will be made public when their investigation is complete. We have also increased sampling and screening of papayas at the border. In addition, the FDA is actively collaborating with our counterparts in the Mexican government regarding this current outbreak through the agency’s Latin America Office to determine ways to further our collaborative prevention efforts.

The U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act prohibits food producers from introducing, or delivering for introduction, into interstate commerce adulterated foods (meaning foods that are potentially harmful to consumers). Additionally, there are new requirements under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The Produce Safety Rule under FSMA sets science- and risk-based minimum standards for domestic and foreign farms for the safe growing, harvesting, packing and holding of covered produce, which includes papayas. Another FSMA rule, the Foreign Supplier Verification Program(FSVP) makes importers responsible for verifying that the foods they bring into the U.S., including papayas, have been produced in a manner that meets applicable U.S. safety standards.

We take our responsibility to protect public health very seriously and will continue to use all of our regulatory authorities and enforcement tools available to do so. So, today we issued a warning letter to a papaya importer, Agroson’s LLC, following an FDA investigation at the facility in conjunction with the current outbreak. This investigation uncovered significant violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Rest assured that the FDA will continue to strengthen safeguards and prevent contaminated papayas from being imported into the U.S. Our efforts also include education, outreach, training and research activities designed to support farmers’ efforts to keep their crops safe for consumers.

Although today’s actions focus on the papaya industry, recurring outbreaks taking place with any commodity are unacceptable from a public health perspective. We know that more must be done by industry as repeated illness outbreaks are a threat to public health. In such situations, it is incumbent upon all sectors of the industry to work together to investigate the cause, review food safety procedures and practices, and take action to prevent further outbreaks.

We must take collective steps to eliminate the threat that recurring outbreaks pose to consumers and look forward to working with the papaya industry as well as all food producers to ensure that America’s food supply remains among the safest in the world.

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.