Category Archives: Food Inspections

USA – Foster Farms Sickens 416 to Date

Food Poisoning BulletinSalmonella

Salmonella on Foster Farms chicken has sickened at least 416 people in 23 states, according to the latest update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The outbreak strains of Salmonella Heidelberg are resistant to several commonly prescribed antibiotics which may be a factor in the 40 percent  hospitalization rate for this outbreak, which is about twice the average.

The company has not issued a recall for the chicken and despite its plans to improve in October conditions at three plants associated with the outbreak, reports of illness continued through the end of November and perhaps beyond, according to the CDC.

Research – Retail Packed Chicken and Microorganisms

Food Safety News imagesCAYZ5I84

It won’t all harm you, but some of it might. That’s the caveat in the latest Consumer Reports analysis of tests on raw chicken breasts purchased at retailers nationwide. The analysis found that 97 percent of tested chicken breast samples “harbored bacteria that could make you sick.”

While it is true that the detected bacteria could cause infections if improperly handled, a smaller proportion has the potential to cause foodborne illness in the classic sense.

USA – Recall Meatballs – Listeria monocyotgenes

USDAEurofins Food Testing UK

E. & F. Inc., a St. Louis establishment, is recalling approximately 123
pounds of frozen, ready-to-eat meatballs due to possible contamination with
Listeria monocytogenes, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food
Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.

Research – High-Pressure Processing and Boiling Water Treatments for Reducing Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus During Beef Jerky Processing

Science Direct

Beef jerky is a convenient, ready-to-eat meat product, but requires processing lethality steps to ensure the safety of the product. Previous outbreaks involving various jerky products have highlighted the risks associated with jerky and the importance of utilizing pathogen interventions during processing. In this study, two alternative interventions were evaluated for reducing pathogen populations during jerky processing. Results demonstrated that high pressure processing (HPP; two treatments of 550 MPa, 60 s) could produce significant (p < 0.05), but variable reductions (6.83 and 4.45 log10 CFU/strip) of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157:H7, respectively, on resulting beef jerky. HPP treatments, however, produced minor reductions (p < 0.05) of Gram-positive pathogens, resulting in reductions of 1.28 and 1.32 log10 CFU/strip of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. Alternatively, boiling water (100 ± 2 °C) treatments (20–30 s) used after marination and prior to dehydration, reduced Salmonella spp., E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes, and S. aureus populations >5.0 log10 CFU/strip in resulting beef jerky. Thus, 20 or 30 s boiling water (100 ± 2 °C) treatments could be effective interventions for commercial jerky processors or home food preservers. Future validation of these processes in-plant could provide processors and regulators with alternative strategies for safe and shelf-stable jerky products.

RASFF Alerts – Aflatoxin – Groundnuts – Maize – Dried Figs

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 4.10; Tot. = 18.32 µg/kg – ppb) in organic hazelnuts from Turkey in Germany

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 15; Tot. = 24 µg/kg – ppb) in groundnuts in shell from China in Portugal

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 2.8 µg/kg – ppb) in groundnuts from China in Portugal

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 4 µg/kg – ppb) in groundnut kernels from China in Finland

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 9.7; Tot. = 13.5 µg/kg – ppb) in groundnut kernels from Brazil, via the Netherlands in Germany

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 12.3; Tot. = 16.5 µg/kg – ppb) in groundnut kernels from Brazil, via the Netherlands in Germany

RASFF –aflatoxins (B1 = 46.4; Tot. = 49.3 µg/kg – ppb) and fumonisins (<20 µg/kg – ppb) in maize from Egypt in the UK

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 43.9; Tot. = 54.7 µg/kg – ppb) in blanched groundnuts from China, via the Netherlands in Malta

RASFF -aflatoxins (B1 = 36.53; Tot. = 38.8 µg/kg – ppb) in dried figs from Turkey in Germany

 

 

RASFF Alert – Norovirus – Frozen Raspberries

RASFF -norovirus in frozen raspberries from Poland, via Belgium in Finland

RASFF Alert – Listeria monocytogenes – Cheese

RASFF – Listeria monocytogenes in cheese from France in Luxembourg

RASFf Alerts – Salmonella – Paan Leaves – Poultry – Rucola – Frozen Clams

RASFF -Salmonella spp. (presence /25g) in frozen clams from Vietnam in Portugal

RASFF -Salmonella spp. in frozen clams (Meretrix spp.) from Vietnam in Portugal

RASFF -Salmonella spp. (presence /25g) in frozen clams (Meretrix spp.) from Vietnam in Portugal

RASFF -Salmonella infantis and Salmonella Mbandaka in chilled boneless chicken thighs from Poland in Italy

RASFF -Salmonella spp. in paan leaves from Bangladesh in the UK

RASFF -Salmonella spp. (presence /25g) in frozen basted chicken breast from Poland

RASFF -Salmonella Newport (present /25g) in frozen turkey meat from Poland in Denmark

RASFF -Salmonella enterica in frozen turkey meat preparation from Brazil in the Netherlands

RASFF -Salmonella infantis (in 5 out of 12 /25g) in chilled chicken breasts from Italy in Denmark

RASFF -Salmonella spp. (presence /25g) in frozen poultry meat preparations from Brazil in the Netherlands

RASFF -Salmonella szentes (present /25g) in rucola from Spain in Sweden

RASFF -Salmonella Heidelberg (presence /25g) in frozen salted chicken breast fillets (Gallus gallus) from Brazil in the Netherlands

RASFF -Salmonella (presence /25g) in paan leaves from Bangladesh in the UK

RASFF -Salmonella (present/25g) in paan leaves from India in the UK

RASFF -Salmonella spp. (presence /25g) in paan leaves from Bangladesh in the UK

 

 

 

 

 

 

RASFF Alerts – Animal Feeds – Salmonella – Protein – Soy – Muesli – Soybean – Aflatoxin – Maize

RASFF -Salmonella anatum (in 1 out of 4 samples /25g) in processed animal proteins (chicken) from the Netherlands in Sweden

RASFF -Salmonella Mbandaka (presence /25g) in soy expller from Brazil, via the Netherlands in Belgium

RASFF -Salmonella Senftenberg (presence /25g) in muesli for calves from Germany in Finland

RASFF -Salmonella Agona (present /25g) in non GMO soybean meal from Italy in Austria

RASFF -Salmonella Mbandaka (in 1 out of 99 samples /25g) in GMO soybean meal from Germany, via Switzerland in Finland

RASSF – aflatoxins (B1 = 75.2 / B1 = 12.7 / B1 = 20.1 µg/kg – ppb) in maize from Hungary in Germany

 

Research – Current Intervention Strategies for the Microbial Safety of Sprouts

Ingenta Connect

Sprouts have gained popularity worldwide due to their nutritional values and health benefits. The fact that their consumption has been associated with numerous outbreaks of foodborne illness threatens the $250 million market that this industry has established in the United States. Therefore, sprout manufacturers have utilized the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommended application of 20,000 ppm of calcium hypochlorite solution to seeds before germination as a preventative method. Concentrations of up to 200 ppm of chlorine wash are also commonly used on sprouts. However, chlorine-based treatment achieves on average only 1- to 3-log reductions in bacteria and is associated with negative health and environmental issues. The search for alternative strategies has been widespread, involving chemical, biological, physical, and hurdle processes that can achieve up to 7-log reductions in bacteria in some cases. The compilation here of the current scientific data related to these techniques is used to compare their efficacy for ensuring the microbial safety of sprouts and their practicality for commercial producers. Of specific importance for alternative seed and sprout treatments is maintaining the industry-accepted germination rate of 95% and the sensorial attributes of the final product. This review provides an evaluation of suggested decontamination technologies for seeds and sprouts before, during, and after germination and concludes that thermal inactivation of seeds and irradiation of sprouts are the most practical stand-alone microbial safety interventions for sprout production.