The pet industry has evolved in recent decades due to increasing pet populations, stronger human–pet bonds and demand for high-quality pet food products [1,2]. Processed pet food manufactured with various processing methods (e.g. grinding, cooking, extrusion and dehydration) has traditionally been considered microbiological safe and nutritionally suitable for feeding pets [1,3]. However, since some pet owners consider unprocessed food healthier, raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for dogs have gained popularity [1,2,4]. The RMBDs are mainly composed of uncooked or minimally processed meat, bones and organs, with freezing as the primary treatment, and are considered to be more natural than conventional processed pet food [1,5]. Nevertheless, the scientific evidence supporting RMBD benefits is scarce, and many veterinary professional organisations (e.g. the World Small Animal Veterinary Association) and international public health agencies (e.g. the United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)) view them as potential health hazards for both animals and humans [1,5]; awareness of this issue appears less evident in Europe [6]. The safety concerns associated with RMBDs are related to the potential contamination of raw ingredients with zoonotic pathogenic bacteria and parasites [1,3,4]. Such contamination could lead to the spread of these pathogens to both pets and humans cohabitating with pets, through direct contact with the pet or its feed, or indirectly through contact with contaminated household surfaces or hands during feed preparation.
In the European Union (EU), legal requirements for the use of animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption are established, including those to produce processed or raw pet food, helping to ensure microbiological safety [7]. Nevertheless, since 2020, there have been more than 20 notifications or recalls of pet food and RMBD in the EU due to the detection of zoonotic pathogens, particularly Salmonella and pathogenic Escherichia coli [8], and also cases of human infections with Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) linked to exposure to RMBDs [9–11]. Several studies have also established a correlation between the microbiota of pets and their owners, including the presence of antibiotic-resistant strains, with pet food as a potential source [12,13]. However, certain antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes of public health concern, such as the mcr gene conferring resistance to the last-line antibiotic colistin, have not been extensively studied in pet food and RMBDs [1,14–16]. Consequently, these antibiotic-resistant strains and genes have not been recognised as notable food safety issues in the context of the pet food industry [6]. To address this knowledge gap, we aimed to investigate the occurrence of and further characterise Salmonella and other Enterobacteriaceae resistant to critical antibiotics, such as colistin, in dog food, including RMBDs, that is available in stores in Portugal to investigate if they represent a possible source of these hazards to public health.
Although previous studies have associated feeding dogs uncooked meat with their carriage and excretion of antibiotic resistant (ABR) Escherichia coli, this practice remains popular amongst dog owners in some countries, including the UK. Uncooked meat fed to dogs is purchased from stores selling meat primarily for human consumption, or it is a brand of commercial raw dog food (RDF), which is commonly sold frozen and thawed prior to feeding. We tested 58 packets of uncooked meat (beef, chicken, lamb and pork) purchased from large chain grocery stores (15 stores) and 15 packets of thawed, chicken-based RDF (11 brands) for the presence of ABR E. coli. All samples were purchased from the city of Bristol, UK. Among grocery store-purchased meat, chicken samples were significantly more likely to be positive for E. coli resistant to amoxicillin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, and the critically important antibiotics cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin, than other types of meat. When comparing grocery store chicken to chicken-based RDF we found no significant difference in sample-level positivity for resistant E. coli, which, for RDF was 80% (amoxicillin), 80% (spectinomycin), 87% (streptomycin), 27% (amoxicillin-clavulanate), 27% (cefotaxime) and 47% (ciprofloxacin). We conclude that despite it having been purchased frozen and thawed prior to testing according to the manufacturer’s instructions, contamination of RDF with ABR E. coli is similar to that of uncooked meat primarily intended for human consumption after cooking, and so the same strict hygiene practices are advised when handling RDF as uncooked meat. Our findings provide a rationale to explain why feeding uncooked meat or RDF to dogs in the city of Bristol is associated with them excreting E. coli resistant to critically important antibiotics.
Escherichia coli in Japanese clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) from Portugal in Spain
Posted in E.coli, food contamination, food handler, Food Hazard, Food Hygiene, Food Inspections, Food Micro Blog, Food Microbiology, Food Microbiology Blog, Food Microbiology Testing, Food Pathogen, Food Quality, food recall, Food Safety, Food Safety Alert, Food Safety Management, Food Safety Regulations, Food Testing, RASFF
The raw ground beef items were produced on April 26-27, 2024. The following products are subject to recall [view labels]:
The products subject to recall all bear the USDA mark of inspection on the front of the product label, and establishment number “EST. 86P” printed on the back of the product label. These items were shipped to Walmart retail locations nationwide.
The establishment reported the issue to FSIS after they identified that previously segregated product had been inadvertently utilized in the production of ground beef.
There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an illness should contact a healthcare provider.
E. coli O157:H7 is a potentially deadly bacterium that can cause dehydration, bloody diarrhea and abdominal cramps 2-8 days (3-4 days, on average) after exposure the organism. While most people recover within a week, some develop a type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). This condition can occur among persons of any age but is most common in children under 5-years old and older adults. It is marked by easy bruising, pallor, and decreased urine output. Persons who experience these symptoms should seek emergency medical care immediately.
FSIS is concerned that some product may be in consumers’ refrigerators or freezers. Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.
FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website at www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls.
FSIS advises all consumers to safely prepare their raw meat products, including fresh and frozen, and only consume ground beef that has been cooked to a temperature of 160 F. The only way to confirm that ground beef is cooked to a temperature high enough to kill harmful bacteria is to use a food thermometer that measures internal temperature, https://www.fsis.usda.gov/safetempchart.
Consumers with questions about the recall can contact Cargill Meat Solutions at 1-844-419-1574. Members of the media with questions about the recall can contact Chuck Miller, Senior Communications Manager, Cargill Meat Solutions at 612-430-2882 or media@cargill.com.
Consumers with food safety questions can call the toll-free USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline at 888-MPHotline (888-674-6854) or send a question via email to MPHotline@usda.gov. For consumers that need to report a problem with a meat, poultry, or egg product, the online Electronic Consumer Complaint Monitoring System can be accessed 24 hours a day at https://foodcomplaint.fsis.usda.gov/eCCF/.
Posted in E.coli, E.coli O157, E.coli O157:H7, food contamination, food handler, Food Hazard, Food Hygiene, Food Inspections, Food Micro Blog, Food Microbiology, Food Microbiology Blog, Food Microbiology Testing, Food Pathogen, Food Quality, food recall, Food Safety, Food Safety Alert, Food Safety Management, Food Testing
Leafy greens are valuable for their dietary fibre and nutrients, yet they may also carry dangerous pathogens. Lettuce, in particular, has frequently been linked to foodborne illness outbreaks in the U.S. A recent study from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign investigates the factors influencing E. coli contamination in five different types of leafy greens: romaine lettuce, green-leaf lettuce, spinach, kale, and collard greens.
“We are seeing a lot of outbreaks on lettuce, but not so much on kale and other brassica vegetables. We wanted to learn more about the susceptibility of different leafy greens,” said lead author Mengyi Dong, now a postdoctoral research associate at Duke University. Dong conducted the research as a doctoral student in the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition (FSHN), part of the College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences (ACES) at the U. of I.
The researchers infected whole leaves from each of the five vegetables with E. coli O157:H7 and observed what happened after storage at 4° C (39° F), 20° C (68° F), and 37° C (98.6° F). Overall, they found that susceptibility was determined by a combination of temperature and leaf surface properties such as roughness and the natural wax coating.
“At room temperature or higher, E. coli grows very fast on lettuce, but if lettuce is refrigerated at 4° C (39° F), we see a sharp decline in the E. coli population. However, for waxy greens like kale and collard, we get the opposite results. On these vegetables, E. coli grows slower under warmer temperatures, but if it is already present, it can survive longer under refrigeration.”
FoodWorld 