The recall is due to microbial (mycotoxin patulin) contamination
Food products containing mycotoxin (patulin) may cause illness if consumed.
Consumers should not drink this product and should return the products to the place of purchase for a full refund.
For further information, please contact Juicy Isle Pty Ltd by phone on 03 6274 5999 or via www.Juicyisle.com.au
An employee tested positive for hepatitis A at LaRoma’s Pizzeria in Rome, New York, according to a press release issued by the Oneida County Health Department. The employee “worked while infectious and may have exposed people who were patrons of the shop,” according to the press release. The Health Department is also alerting people who ordered take-out food from that venue.
On 12 May 2020, Health Protection Scotland (HPS) published the following annual surveillance reports:
Contamination of fresh produce with the foodborne pathogens Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 continues to be problematic, resulting in outbreaks of foodborne illness and costly corporate recalls. Various individual concentrations of citric or lactic acids (0.35 to 0.61%) or isopropyl citrate (0.16 to 0.54%) combined with two generally recognized as safe surfactants, 0.025% sodium-2-ethyl-hexyl sulfate and 0.025% sodium dodecylbenzene-sulfonate, were tested against these three pathogens in suspension and when inoculated and dried on the surface of grape tomatoes. The efficacy of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO; at 46 ppm) was also evaluated under dirty and clean conditions in suspension after addition of 0.3 or 0.03% bovine serum albumin, respectively, as an organic load. NaClO (46 ppm) inactivated the three pathogens in suspension by <0.76 log CFU/mL after 5 min in the presence of 0.3% bovine serum albumin, whereas 9 and 15 ppm of free chlorine inactivated the pathogens by 0.64 and 2.77 log CFU/mL, respectively, after 5 min under clean conditions. Isopropyl citrate (0.16% acidulant) plus 0.05% total concentration of the two surfactants inactivated the pathogens in suspension by up to 7.0 log CFU/mL within 2 min. When applied to grape tomatoes for 2 min, 0.54% isopropyl citrate plus 0.025% concentrations of each of the two surfactants reduced Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes by as much as ca. 5.47, 4.89, and 4.19 log CFU/g, respectively. These reductions were significantly greater than those achieved with 49 ppm of free chlorine. Citric acid and lactic acid plus surfactant washes achieved greater inactivation than water-only washes, reducing Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes on tomatoes by up to 4.90, 4.37, and 3.98 log CFU/g, respectively. These results suggest that these combinations of acidulants and surfactants may be an effective tool for preventing cross-contamination during the washing of grape tomatoes, for reducing pathogens on the fruit itself, and as an alternative to chlorine for washing fresh produce.
Management of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC), including E. coli O157:H7, in food products is a major challenge for the food industry. Several interventions, such as irradiation, chemical disinfection, and pasteurization, have had variable success controlling STEC contamination. However, these interventions also indiscriminately kill beneficial bacteria in foods, may impact organoleptic properties of foods, and are not always environmentally friendly. Biocontrol using bacteriophage-based products to reduce or eliminate specific foodborne pathogens in food products has been gaining attention due to the specificity, safety, and environmentally friendly properties of lytic bacteriophages. We developed EcoShield PX, a cocktail of lytic bacteriophages, that specifically targets STEC. This study was conducted to examine the efficacy of this bacteriophage cocktail for reducing the levels of E. coli O157:H7 in eight food products: beef chuck roast, ground beef, chicken breast, cooked chicken, salmon, cheese, cantaloupe, and romaine lettuce. The food products were challenged with E. coli O157:H7 at ca. 3.0 log CFU/g and treated with the bacteriophage preparation at ca. 1 × 106, 5 × 106, or 1 × 107 PFU/g. Application of 5 × 106 and 1 × 107 PFU/g resulted in significant reductions (P < 0.05) in E. coli O157:H7 levels of up to 97% in all foods. When bacteriophages (ca. 1 × 106 PFU/g) were used to treat lower levels of E. coli O157:H7 (ca. 1 to 10 CFU/10 g) on beef chuck roast samples, mimicking the levels of STEC found under real-life conditions in food processing plants, the prevalence of STEC in the samples was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) by ≥80%. Our results suggest that this STEC-targeting bacteriophage preparation can result in significant reduction of both the levels and prevalence of STEC in various foods and, therefore, may help improve the safety and reduce the risk of recalls of foods at high risk for STEC contamination.
The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) today issued a public health warning advising the public not to collect or consume shellfish harvested from all of Nydia Bay in the Pelorus Sound.
Routine tests on shellfish samples taken from this region have shown levels of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) toxins above the safe limit of 0.8 mg/kg set by MPI. Anyone eating shellfish from this area is potentially at risk of illness.
Pāua, crab and crayfish may still be eaten if the gut has been completely removed prior to cooking, as toxins accumulate in the gut. If the gut is not removed its contents could contaminate the meat during the cooking process.
Symptoms typically appear between 10 minutes and 3 hours after ingestion and may include:
If anyone becomes ill after eating shellfish from an area where a public health warning has been issued, phone Healthline for advice on 0800 61 11 16, or seek medical attention immediately. You are also advised to contact your nearest public health unit and keep any leftover shellfish in case it can be tested.
Monitoring of toxin levels will continue and any changes will be communicated accordingly. Commercially harvested shellfish – sold in shops and supermarkets, or exported – is subject to strict water and flesh monitoring programmes by MPI to ensure they are safe to eat.
During an internal control, the presence of Salmonella was noted in the liquid white egg product bearing the expiry date of 21/09/2020 .
In consultation with the AFSCA, the manufacturer therefore decided to withdraw the product concerned from sale and to recall it to consumers.
Customers who bought this product are advised not to consume it and bring it back to the store, where it will be refunded. In the meantime, all stores have removed the affected products from the shelves.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
This product was offered for sale via the following stores: Colruyt, Okay and Okay Compact.
Quality of stored almonds is compromised by insect infestations and microbial contamination. Nitric oxide (NO) is a potent fumigant for postharvest pest control on fresh and stored products. NO fumigation must be conducted under ultralow oxygen conditions, and it always produces nitrogen dioxide (NO2), depending on the O2 level in the fumigation chamber. NO and NO2 have proven antimicrobial effects but have not been tested for efficacy against microbes in almonds. We evaluated, in this study, fumigation of unpasteurized almonds with NO2 at different levels for inhibition of bacteria and fungi. Almonds were fumigated with 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0% NO under ambient O2 to generate 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0% NO2 conditions; the fumigation treatments lasted 1 or 3 days at 25°C. GreenLight rapid enumeration tests on diluted wash-off almond samples from NO2 fumigation treatments showed either greatly reduced microbial loads or complete control of microorganisms, depending on NO2 concentration and treatment duration. NO2 fumigation was more effective against fungi than against bacteria. These results suggest that postharvest NO fumigation with proper levels of NO and NO2 can be used for insect and microorganism control on stored almonds.
A wide range of fungal species is associated with post-harvest spoilage of grapes. However, Aspergillus carbonarius is the primary fungus responsible for the contamination of grapes with ochratoxin A, a mycotoxin causing several confirmed health effects to humans and animals. Aiming to find a method, safe for the consumers, to prevent post-harvest decay and ochratoxin A contamination of grapes, the potential use of essential oils as preservatives was investigated. Essential oils of Origanum dictamnus (dittany) , Origanum onites (oregano) , Origanum microphyllum (marjoram) , Thymbra capitata (thyme) , Satureja thymbra (savory) , Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary) , Laurus nobilis (laurel) and Salvia officinalis (sage) were tested. The essential oil components were identified by GC/MS analysis. A first evaluation of the effectiveness of essential oils was performed in vitro , at a range of concentrations up to 300 μL L -1 . Based on the results of the in vitro tests, the four most effective essential oils ( O. dictamnus , O. onites , T. capitata and S. thymbra ) were tested on Sultana grapes, during post-harvest storage. The four essential oils tested, having the carvacrol and/or thymol as a common component, at a high concentration, significantly reduced, or even completely inhibited the growth of the fungus, in all treatments. As revealed from the results, the essential oils of O. dictamnus , O. onites and S. thymbra were the most effective, causing total inhibition on the growth of the fungus with a minimum concentration of 100 μL L -1 , followed by the essential oil of T. capitata , total effective with a minimum concentration of 200 μL L -1 . Essential oils of O. microphyllum , L. nobilis , S. officinalis and R. officinalis , although they had a significant effect on the growth of A. carbonarius , failed to inhibit its growth completely at any of the concentrations tested.
The use of high-throughput methods allows a better characterization of food-related bacterial communities. However, such methods require large amounts of high quality bacterial DNA, which may be a challenge when dealing with a complex matrix that has a low concentration of bacteria like fresh fish fillets. Therefore, the choice of method used to recover bacteria from a food matrix in a cost-effective way is critical, yet little information is available on the performance of commonly used methods. We assessed the recovery capacity of two such methods: stomaching and mechanical rinsing. The efficiency of the methods was evaluated through the quantitative recovery and compatibility with end-point qPCR. Fresh rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) fillets were inoculated with a bacterial marker, Brochothrix thermosphacta , at different concentrations (7.52 to 1.52 log CFU/g). The fillets were processed by one of the two methods and the recovery of the marker in the suspensions was assessed by plate counting and qPCR targeting B. thermosphacta – rpoC . The same analyses were performed on 6 non-inoculated fresh fillets. Stomaching and mechanical rinsing allowed an efficient and repeatable recovery of the bacterial communities from the 42 inoculated fillets. No significant differences of Recovery Ratios were observed between the marker enumerated in the inoculation suspensions and in the corresponding recovery suspensions after rinsing and stomaching. However, the stomaching method allowed too many particles to pass through the filters bag, making necessary a limiting supplementary filtration step. As a consequence, only the rinsing recovery method allowed a proper PCR quantification of the inoculated B. thermosphacta. The mean recovered bacterial level of the fillets was around 3 log CFU/g. It seems more relevant and cost-effective to recover the endogenous bacterial microbiota of a fish fillet structure using the rinsing method rather than the stomaching method.
