We wish to offer some cautionary remarks concerning the report by Bruggink et al. [1]. From an initial reading of the article, one could get the impression that the GII.P4_New_Orleans_2009_GII.4_Sydney_2012 recombinant form has only been possibly detected once before this study [2] and has – due to indicated novelty – a yet unknown pandemic potential. However, the GII.P4_New_Orleans_2009_GII.4_Sydney_2012 recombinant form has been reported earlier, both by us [3] in 2013 as well as by others [4,5]. The ORF1-ORF2 intergenic sequence (KX064756.1) submitted by the authors is almost identical (99.3%; 748 of 753 bp) to one of the sequences we submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information/GenBank in 2013 (KF199164.1), yet the authors only show separate phylogenies of the ORF1 fragment and capsid genes in their manuscript, masking the homology with previously published intergenic sequences.
Archives
-
Join 346 other subscribers
KSWFoodWorld
Blog Stats
- 444,978 Views
